Political Movement and Civil Disobedience: Abstention Behavior of the Hindu-Buddhist Dayak Indigenous Community Bumi Segandu Indramayu
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61166/policy.v1i1.1Keywords:
social movements, civil disobedience, abstention behavior, existenceAbstract
This research discusses political movements and civil disobedience which can be seen from the abstention behavior of the Bumi Segandu Indramayu Hindu-Buddhist Dayak Indigenous Community. This research aims to explain the behavior of the Bumi Segandu Indramayu Hindu-Buddhist Dayak Indigenous Community for abstention from the 2004 elections to the 2008 West Java regional elections and the factors that influenced it. This research uses descriptive research methods with a qualitative approach with ethnographic types. The results of this research reveal that the abstention behavior of the Bumi Segandu Indramayu Hindu-Buddhist Dayak Indigenous Community in Losarang District is a social movement that has developed into civil disobedience. There are two factors that influence the community's abstention, namely: 1) the existence of cultural values that influence the existence of the community, namely belief in nature which prioritizes elements of justice; and 2) the community's dislike for the conditions created during the New Order era until now. For this reason, the Bumi Segandu Indramayu Hindu-Buddhist Dayak Traditional Community dares to face all forms of challenges that oppose its existence and continues to carry out its activities with the aim of making their existence and form of existence acceptable to society.
References
Almond, Gabriel dan Sidney Verba. 1990. Budaya Politik, Tingkah Laku Politik dan Demokrasi di Lima Negara. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.
Budiardjo, Miriam. 2008. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik Edisi Revisi. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta.
Dahl, Robert.2001. Perihal Demokrasi. Yayasan Obor Indonesia. Jakarata.
Eko, Sutoro. 2004. Tantangan Konsolidasi Demokrasi Melalui Masyarakat Sipil. Makalah dalam Workshop “Civil Society, Citizenship and Democratic Consolidation in Indonesia”, diselenggarakan oleh Indonesian Forum on Local Politics and Democratization, 9-11 Maret 2004. Yogyakarta.
Gurr, TR. 1970. Why Men Rebel. NJ: Princenton University Press. Princenton.
Hadi, Mahfudz Samsul. 2008. Belajar dari Kesesatan. Majalah Dinamika Cermin Gerakan Pemikiran Santri. Indramayu.
Huntington, Samuel P dan Juan P Nelson. 1996. Partisipasi Politik di Negara Berkembang. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta.
Jatmika, Sidik. 2001. Otonomi Daerah Prespektif Hubungan Internasional. Bigraf Publishing. Yogyakarta.
Kaloh, J. 2002. Mencari Bentuk Otonomi Daerah Suatu Solusi dalam Menjawab Kebutuhan Lokal dan Tantangan Global. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta.
Mas’oed, Mochtar. Collin Mac Andrews. 1987. Perbandingan Sistem Politik. Gajahmada University Press. Yogyakarta.
McAdam, Doug, John D. McCarthy, and Mayer N. Zald (eds.). 1996. Comparative Perspectives in Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
Meyer, David and Sidney Tarrow. 1998. The Social Movement Society. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Mirsel, Robert. 2004. Teori Pergerakan Sosial Kilasan Sejarah dan Catatan Bibliografis. Resist Book. Yogyakarta.
Sastroatmodjo, Sudijono. 1995. Perilaku Politik. IKIP Semarang Press. Semarang.
Sorensen, George. 2003. Demokrasi dan Demokratisasi: Proses dan Prospek dalam Dunia yang Sedang Berubah. Pustaka Pelajar. Yogyakarta.
Spradley, P James. 2007. Metode Etnografi. Tiara Wacana. Yogyakarta.
Sudiardja, A. 2001. "Civil Disobedience " dalam "Etika Politik dalam Konteks Indonesia". Kanisius. Jakarta.
Suparlan, Parsudi. 2004. Hubungan Antar Suku Bangsa. Yayasan Pengembangan Kajian Ilmu Kepolisian. Jakarta.
Surbakti, Ramlan. 1992. Memahami Ilmu Politik. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta.
